Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ai Miller's avatar

WE ARE NOT THE EYE WE ARE THE EAR

PODCASTS ARE THE PANOPTICON

Like we are voyeurs to all things we "consume" in some ways--I think about this a lot as a historian, and the ways in which we reinscribe violence by teaching about violence, by reexposing that brutality again and again and again (see: the work of Saidiya Hartman on the topic.) And I think that there are ways in which violence in fiction can definitely still be like voyeuristic and violent, not that you were saying it's not exactly. Not to spoil my own newsletter for this week (lol) but I talk about the fictionalization of the violence of enslavement (it makes sense in context.)

And yet at the same time on a historical level there is also power in fiction (I'm specifically of the work by the same author whose book I wrote about this week, Tiya Miles, and her novel Cherokee Rose that she wrote because we can't speak for the places where the archive has gaps but we can imagine through fiction. And I'll be honest that I'm not sure about what to do with that gap (imagining versus reinscribing) and I also know that like the situation I'm writing about (primarily enslavement in the US) is not the same as like TMA and fictionality. But it's something I'm still teasing out. (How might we explore refusal in fiction--refusing to show the actual violence, dealing with aftermath or not seeing it onscreen?)

Anyway lol I love to ramble but it definitely did make me think!

Expand full comment

No posts